RE: Re: Time for the "new old new" mall? and Furry Freak Bros.
Don't worry. They're comics; and they're printed on newsprint... which
means they will disintigrate in a few decades. And there's nothing he can
do about it because that's the nature of wood pulp paper. Unless, of
course, he digitizes them... Then, while you might not be able to fondle
them, at least you can see them and confuse the kids.
Elena
(ducks and bolts for cover, knowing how unsafe it is to poke fun at comic
fans)
-----Original Message-----
From: Georgie Hinklemyer [mailto:samoolives_at_yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:42 PM
To: OliveStarlightOrchestra_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [OliveStarlightOrchestra] Re: Time for the "new old new" mall?
and Furry Freak Bros.
Why was I not surprised to see YOU be the first to reply, Hiram?
And the real reason no one is "allowed" to get near them is because
you've HIDDEN them in a place we haven't found yet. Just wait until
next Spring cleaning....
AND GET YOUR COTTON-PICKIN' EYEBALLS OUT OF THE PUSSYCAT THEATER! The
dinner dishes are waiting for you in the sink. And they won't clean
themselves, buddy!
*taps frying pan impatiently against one hand*
--G.H.
--- In OliveStarlightOrchestra_at_yahoogroups.com, "Hiram Gonash"
<okfreddy_at_h...> wrote:
>
> I have all of the Furry Freak Brothers...but no one and I mean *NO
> ONE* (spouse, kids, etc.) are allowed to get near them. They are
> sacred. Except Mike. He knows the respect that these comics command.
>
> And it has nothing to do with drugs. Nothing. Nope. Dope. Cat.
> Flashback. (*shake*)
>
> Check with a local comic shop...
>
> As for S&M Maul, adios. With the upscaling of S&M as represented by
> the Maul, they managed to get rid of an institution, a landmark.
>
> Tear down the Maul and bring back the Pussycat!!!
>
> --H.G.
>
> They could make the Pussycat into a burlesque revue...what a trendy
idea!
>
> --- In OliveStarlightOrchestra_at_yahoogroups.com, Ellen <ellenm1_at_a...>
> wrote:
> > Been reading your messages about the mall being torn down - I
remember
> > when they built that. It was so shiny and new compared to the
miserable
> > condition at the time of the Santa Monica Mall. Then they spiffied
up
> > the Mall, and SM Place no longer looked nearly as interesting.
Seems
> > like an incredible waste.
> >
> > While I'm writing - anyone happen to have some old Fabulous Furry
Freak
> > brothers comics laying around? In particular the Thanksgiving
episode
> > where they kill the turkey by giving it an overdose of downers,
and one
> > doesn't bother to stuff it because "it was already stuffed"? I
wish
> > I'd saved those - want to send that one to a friend.
> >
> > Ellen
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 20, 2004, at 1:53 AM, Georgie Hinklemyer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Grass is easy enough, although a vegetable garden would be more
> > > practical and politically appropriate. But they'll probably
choose
> > > lots of different, colorful plants (xeriscaped?) which need
about a
> > > foot or less of dirt. Azaleas or camelias could work, although
they
> > > prefer shade. Cactus would appreciate the unobstructed
sunlight.
> > > Trees? Possible, if boxed up. They'd probably go with crepe
myrtle
> > > because it's shapely, flowery, and easy to grow. (They're not
even a
> > > true tree.)
> > >
> > > Forget saplings, and especially the palm trees (although their
roots
> > > are shallow enough). The biggest problem will be the stronger
winds
> > > up there. Unobstructed High winds. You wouldn't WANT things
that
> > > were tall enough to be knocked over.
> > >
> > > What about wildlife? A few birds will show up, maybe. Some
rats will
> > > inevitably move in for the human leavings. What about
earthworms?
> > > Composting bacteria? At least a couple of squirrels to munch on
the
> > > myrtle branches? None. Now THAT'S boring. (On the other hand,
they
> > > can probably do without insecticides for quite a long time, not
having
> > > anything nearby to "share" with them.)
> > >
> > > Another problem: several feet of dirt would weigh close to solid
> > > cement at half the thickness. They'll be putting quite a strain
on
> > > the structure if it goes too deep. It'd be even heavier after
it's
> > > been watered. Not to mention the added mass as the plants grow.
> > >
> > > Still, I'd like to see what they do to it. Echoing The Queen's
> > > question below: would the so-called "parks" be open to the
general
> > > public or just to the immediate residents?
> > >
> > > Georgie H.
> > >
> > > P.S. Lenny, you just haven't rolled around in the right kind of
grass
> > > if you think it's all the itchy type... :)
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In OliveStarlightOrchestra_at_yahoogroups.com, "7visions"
> > > <7visions_at_p...> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> What the hell kind of "parkland" can you put on top of a
building???
> > > ?
> > >>
> > >> Big gorgeous trees? Shady paths? Forest glades?
> > >>
> > >> What nonsense!!!!
> > >>
> > >> Guess what it would be, and here I KNOW that I will offend many
> > >> suburbanites....
> > >>
> > >> It would be GRASS!!!! BORING BLAND ITCHY GRASS!!!!! I HATE
LAWNS!!!!
> > > !
> > >>
> > >> and a couple of saplings... and maybe a palm
> > >>
> > >> Here is my suggestion:
> > >>
> > >> Knock out Santa Monica Place, extend the 3rd street Promenade,
have
> > > it
> > >> bisect an open mall of no more than five levels, bring in more
> > > restaurants,
> > >> and a Legit theater ( that is stage theater)and a concert hall.
Add
> > > a
> > >> skateboard park, ( local culture , a tribute to Dogtown) and an
ice
> > > rink for
> > >> the holidays.
> > >>
> > >> Nix the 21 story buildings and DEFINITELY NO ASTROTURF
PARKLANDS
> > >>
> > >> Lenny "Urban Critic" Shaw
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message ----- * I'm really intrigued by the idea
of
> > > adding
> > >> rooftop parkland along the
> > >> tops of the buildings on 2nd and 4th;
> > >>
> > >> * I'm curious as to which strips of green space would be open
to the
> > >> public--would all the parkland at the new new mall be private,
only
> > > for
> > >> residents?
> > >>
> > >> * I wonder how policing of the rooftop parklands would work,
and how
> > >> they'd be lit'
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
Yahoo! Groups Links
Received on 2004-11-22 23:27:42
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: 2020-02-04 07:16:21 UTC