Re: Re: Eminent Domain can take your land away

From: Joy McCann <jmmccann_at_sbcglobal.net_at_hypermail.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:08:49 -0700

In this particular case I meant "conservative" in a very specific way:
justices who 1) believe in individual liberties, and 2) favor an
originalist reading of the Constitution of the United States.

FWIW, there's plenty of outrage all over the political spectrum on
this: many people recognize that real estate developers, in particular,
are likely to have close ties to municipal and state governments, and
this specific expansion of the eminent domain construct is therefore
terribly dangerous.

--J

On Jun 28, 2005, at 1:25 PM, tschibasch wrote:

> --- In OliveStarlightOrchestra_at_yahoogroups.com, Joy McCann
> <jmmccann_at_s...> wrote:
> >
> > Naturally, I think we need to get one more conservative justice in
> > there and get this thing reversed.
>
> Yes, naturally you would think that... You must be delighted at the
> recent "conservative" electoral victory in Iran. ;-)
>
> Conservative? Or should we say "Right Wing"? Or "Republican"? I would
> just like to make the rather obvious point that we need justices with
> common sense. Common sense!
>
> Whether they are called "conservative" or "liberal" is secondary. It
> seems liberals try to help the little guy fight against evil
> corporations, while conservatives try to help the little guy fight
> against evil government? And these often look so much the same... And
> in the end, either conservative or liberal will side AGAINST the
> little guy if they feel they have his best interests at heart.
>
> Let's try to look beyond labels.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> ▪  Visit your group "OliveStarlightOrchestra" on the web.
>  
> ▪  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  OliveStarlightOrchestra-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com
>  
> ▪  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on 2005-06-28 14:08:57

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : 2020-02-04 07:16:22 UTC