Re: Re: Attn: DJQ, film buffs

From: Joy McCann <joy.mccann_at_gmail.com_at_hypermail.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:52:02 -0700

Eminent for being famous. Well-regarded, yet infamous. Or, as Turley once
put it in a letter home from his eight-month sojourn in Europe: "nationally,
as well as internationally, renowned."
I actually wouldn't use the word <i>notorious<i> WRT Hitchcock. But I would
have been happy if they had settled upon one of those words. This is
<i>not</i> a blog post: it's a paper, with multiple authors, who should have
been able to back each other up. Ah . . . who'm I kidding?

--J

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Rin Watt <katecwatt_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> or, to be more exact, specific, and precise, his well-known,
> world-renowned, notoriously famous ability...
>
> Rin
>
>
> "Joy McCann" <joy.mccann_at_...> wrote:
> >
>
> "The fact that Hitchcock was able to orchestrate the responses of so
> manydifferent brain regions, turning them on and off at the same time
> across all viewers, may provide neuroscientific evidence for his
> notoriously famous ability to master and manipulate viewers' minds."
> >
> Not just famous: notoriously famous. [Sigh.]
>
>
>



-- 
Joy Whittemore McCann
Goddess of Ink and Paper
(But pixels obey me, too.)
Copy Write Editorial Services
818/429-9806
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on 2008-06-09 08:52:05

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : 2020-02-04 07:16:25 UTC