> --- In OliveStarlightOrchestra_at_yahoogroups, "tschibasch" wrote:
>
>>If you take a good close look at Alex's cat you will see that it is
>>really one of Carlye's.
Hmm... maybe it's that 13th one we've been looking for.
barkofdelight wrote:
> For those of you who are out-of-towners,
> the joke John is making here is that Carlye
> has so many cats that nobody could possibly
> recognize one from a photo!
Well, that much is true. Some are even like
John, pretty much invisible to the camera.
> Since any picture of a cat of Carlye's would
> be taken or scanned by David, I decided to
> investigate.
Jesus, I'm glad somebody tried to investigate,
since we've all been intensely curious where
those Alex photos actually came from.
> Digital photos have "digital
> watermarks" to help track them in this age
> of piracy and copyright infringement. A simple
> Cut-n-paste of a cat from a scan of David's
> would probably still have this identifying data.
Brilliant, sure it would. Kind of like
the original photographer who shot that lucious
photo of Joy dripping wet by the pool might be
revealed through forensic examination of the grain
patterns and photochemical fingerprint.
> Sure enough, I found it in the fist pic:
> 5665 7279 2066 756e 6e79 2c20 4a6f 686e 210a
Excellent diagnostic work, very funny indeed!
> [Artscans, Inc.]
Hmm, you may want to double check that. It should
really be ArtScans Studio, Inc.
dc
Received on 2005-07-28 17:38:06
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: 2020-02-04 07:16:23 UTC